EAMC₁: A New Metric for AMM-Based Markets
I think the space could benefit from an additional metric for AMM-based markets.
Market caps are often taken at face value as an indicator of how large a project is, as a pseudo-indicator of how much a holder can get out of the project by selling his tokens.
Market capitalization values circulating supply at the current token price :
Holder distribution is probably the next most useful metric, though it's harder to capture in a single number.
So in this short WIP article, I'll suggest the first step towards an additional metric to indicate the size of a project, not to be considered as a replacement for market cap.
The proposal here is what I would call an Exit-Adjusted Market Capitalization, shortened as EAMC.
The intention is to get an indication of what the market cap looks like after an sell, which is very helpful in volatile markets.
We'll add a subscript to EAMC indicating the percentage of circulating supply being sold.
A fixed 1% reference
I suggest we will default to a 1 % sell off, as that is often very likely, it's easy to assess the likelihood by looking at the top holders, and if the impact is severe at 1 %, it's a good indicator of an inflated market cap.
Let be the proceeds from that sale and its average execution price:
Using a fixed 1% reference provides a consistent sale size relative to supply for comparisons.
Example
Consider a hypothetical token with a $26 million MC and a single full-range constant-product pool holding $330,000 in total liquidity.
The quote side holds $165,000. Assume a $1 quote asset and exclude transaction costs/fees.
Selling 1% of circulating supply has a current marked value of $260,000 and returns approximately $100,941 through this pool:
| MC | EAMC₁ |
|---|---|
| $26 million | $10.09 million |
MC uses the current marginal price; EAMC₁ uses the average execution price of the defined sale. The seller receives about $100,941. EAMC₁ expresses that execution price across the circulating supply, rather than total withdrawable funds.
For comparable readings, use consistent liquidity coverage and record the supply source, quote asset, and timestamp. EAMC₁ adds a liquidity reference to MC; it does not measure intrinsic value.